π‘οΈ SEC CATEGORY 1 COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK
OTCM Protocol Legal Architecture for Tokenized Securities
β SEC CATEGORY 1 COMPLIANT | Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities pursuant to SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, and Division of Trading and Markets Joint Statement dated January 28, 2026
π Executive Overview
The SEC Category 1 Compliance Framework is OTCM Protocol's legal architectureβa comprehensive regulatory compliance structure designed to operate tokenized securities within the clear boundaries established by the SEC's January 28, 2026 Joint Statement on Tokenized Securities.
Framework Element | Description |
|---|---|
ποΈ Named After | SEC Category 1 (Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities) framework |
π― Goal | Operate fully compliant tokenized securities infrastructure under federal securities laws |
βοΈ Approach | Embrace securities classification for regulatory clarity and institutional legitimacy |
π Primary Authority | SEC Joint Statement dated January 28, 2026 |
π Strategic Evolution: From Avoidance to Compliance
Why OTCM Protocol Embraces Securities Classification
OTCM Protocol made a deliberate strategic decision to embrace SEC Category 1 securities compliance rather than attempt to structure tokens to avoid securities classification:
Factor | Avoidance Approach (Rejected) | Compliance Approach (Adopted) |
|---|---|---|
βοΈ Regulatory Certainty | Uncertain, untested theories | Clear SEC framework |
π¦ Institutional Access | Limited, compliance concerns | Institutional-ready infrastructure |
π‘οΈ Investor Protection | No federal protections | Full securities law protections |
π Value Proposition | Speculative "meme" tokens | True equity ownership |
ποΈ Legal Standing | Subject to enforcement risk | Operating within established law |
π Market Credibility | "Regulatory arbitrage" perception | Securities market legitimacy |
π― Target Market | Retail speculation | Serious investors seeking liquidity |
π‘ Core Principle: Rather than engineering around securities laws, OTCM Protocol operates within themβproviding the regulatory clarity that enables institutional participation and long-term market sustainability.
βοΈ The SEC Category 1 Framework
ποΈ January 28, 2026 Joint Statement
On January 28, 2026, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, and Division of Trading and Markets issued a landmark Joint Statement establishing clear guidance for tokenized securities.
Core Regulatory Principle
π‘ "The format in which a security is issued or the methods by which holders are recorded does not affect application of the federal securities laws to the security or to transactions in the security."
Category 1 vs. Category 2 Taxonomy
Category | Description | OTCM Status |
|---|---|---|
Category 1 | Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities | β OTCM Model |
Category 2 | Third-Party Tokenized Securities | β Not applicable |
π The Seven Pillars: Category 1 Compliance Requirements
The SEC Category 1 framework establishes seven requirements that OTCM Protocol satisfies:
Pillar 1: ποΈ Direct Issuer Authorization
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
Board Resolution | Issuer board must formally authorize Series M preferred share creation and tokenization | β |
Corporate Action | Tokenization is official corporate act, not third-party initiative | β |
Issuer Responsibility | Issuer takes responsibility for token as equity representation | β |
How It Works:
- Issuer board passes resolution authorizing Series M Preferred Share creation
- Resolution explicitly authorizes tokenization on OTCM Protocol
- Corporate minutes document authorization chain
- No tokenization proceeds without verified board approval
Pillar 2: π Official Shareholder Register
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
Certificate of Designation | Filed with Wyoming Secretary of State | β |
Official Recognition | Token holders recognized as shareholders | β |
Legal Documentation | Preferred share terms formally recorded | β |
How It Works:
- Certificate of Designation filed establishing Series M Preferred Shares
- Certificate defines: conversion rights, protective triggers, dividend rights
- Wyoming Secretary of State records create official shareholder register
- Token ownership maps to official corporate records
Pillar 3: π¦ Regulated Custody
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
SEC-Registered Custodian | Empire Stock Transfer Inc. | β |
Qualified Custody | Shares held by SEC-registered transfer agent | β |
Verification | Real-time custody verification via oracle | β |
How It Works:
- Empire Stock Transfer (SEC-registered transfer agent) holds all backing shares
- Custody verified every ~400ms via Transfer Hook oracle
- No ST22 token can exist without verified custody backing
- Golden Medallion Guarantee authenticates share ownership
Pillar 4: π True Equity Backing
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
1:1 Backing | Each ST22 token backed by one preferred share | β |
Real Ownership | Token represents actual equity, not derivative | β |
Conversion Rights | Convertible to common stock per Certificate | β |
How It Works:
- Every ST22 token represents exactly one Series M Preferred Share
- Shares are real equity in the underlying company
- Conversion rights allow conversion to common stock
- NOT a derivative, NOT a synthetic, NOT a contractual claimβtrue equity
Pillar 5: π Clear Ownership Chain
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
CUSIP Assignment | Unique securities identifier | β |
Golden Medallion | Authentication guarantee | β |
Unambiguous Path | Clear chain from token to underlying asset | β |
How It Works:
- Each Series M issue receives CUSIP number
- Golden Medallion Guarantee authenticates share transfers
- Blockchain provides immutable ownership record
- Clear legal path: Token β Smart Contract β Custody β Shares β Company
Pillar 6: π‘οΈ Investor Protection
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
42 Transfer Hook Controls | Mathematical security enforcement | β |
Protective Conversion | Automatic protection triggers | β |
Circuit Breakers | Trading halt on extreme volatility | β |
How It Works:
- 42 Transfer Hook controls execute on every transaction
- Protective conversion triggers on adverse issuer events
- Circuit breakers halt trading at 30% price decline
- Wallet limits prevent concentration (4.99% maximum)
- OFAC screening prevents sanctioned party transactions
Pillar 7: π Token Standard Compliance
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
SPL Token-2022 | Solana token standard with extensions | β |
Transfer Hooks | Programmable compliance enforcement | β |
Immutable Controls | Security controls cannot be disabled | β |
How It Works:
- SPL Token-2022 standard provides Transfer Hook capability
- Transfer Hooks execute compliance logic on every transaction
- Controls are mathematically enforced, not policy-based
- Major DEXs disable Transfer HooksβCEDEX maintains them
π The 42 Transfer Hook Controls
Mathematical Security Architecture
Unlike the theoretical "shields" of avoidance strategies, Category 1 compliance uses mathematically enforced controls that execute automatically on every transaction:
Control Categories
Category | Controls | Function |
|---|---|---|
π¦ Custody Verification | 6 controls | Verify 1:1 backing on every transaction |
πͺͺ Investor Verification | 8 controls | KYC/AML/accreditation status checks |
π Position Limits | 5 controls | Wallet concentration limits (4.99% max) |
π΄ Circuit Breakers | 4 controls | Trading halts on extreme volatility |
β° Vesting Enforcement | 6 controls | Smart contract vesting schedules |
π« Sanctions Compliance | 5 controls | Real-time OFAC screening |
π Protective Conversion | 4 controls | Automatic protection triggers |
π Record Keeping | 4 controls | Compliance audit trail |
Key Control Details
π¦ Custody Verification Controls
Control | Function | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
CV-01 | Verify custody account balance | Every ~400ms |
CV-02 | Validate 1:1 backing ratio | Per transaction |
CV-03 | Confirm Empire Stock Transfer status | Per transaction |
CV-04 | Check custody oracle health | Continuous |
CV-05 | Validate CUSIP matching | Per transaction |
CV-06 | Confirm Golden Medallion status | Per transfer |
πͺͺ Investor Verification Controls
Control | Function | Enforcement |
|---|---|---|
IV-01 | KYC verification status | Block unverified wallets |
IV-02 | Accredited investor status | Block non-accredited for ST22 |
IV-03 | AML screening results | Block flagged parties |
IV-04 | Identity verification | Require verified identity |
IV-05 | Jurisdiction check | Block prohibited jurisdictions |
IV-06 | Age verification | Block minors |
IV-07 | Professional investor status | Track investor classification |
IV-08 | Verification expiry | Require re-verification |
π΄ Circuit Breaker Controls
Control | Trigger | Action |
|---|---|---|
CB-01 | 30% price decline | Halt trading |
CB-02 | Unusual volume spike | Alert + potential halt |
CB-03 | Rapid consecutive trades | Rate limiting |
CB-04 | Oracle failure | Halt trading |
π Protective Conversion Controls
Control | Trigger Event | Action |
|---|---|---|
PC-01 | Issuer bankruptcy filing | Convert to common stock |
PC-02 | Custody breach | Convert to common stock |
PC-03 | Delisting notification | Convert to common stock |
PC-04 | Material adverse event | Convert to common stock |
β‘ Why Mathematical Enforcement Beats Legal Theory
Legal Theory Approach | Mathematical Enforcement |
|---|---|
β Untested in court | β Executes automatically |
β Subject to interpretation | β Binary: compliant or blocked |
β Depends on good faith | β Cannot be circumvented |
β Enforcement after violation | β Prevention before violation |
β Requires litigation | β Self-executing code |
β Regulatory uncertainty | β Clear compliance status |
π Securities Law Compliance Framework
A. Howey Test: Embraced, Not Avoided
The Four ProngsβAll Satisfied
Unlike avoidance strategies that attempt to "fail" Howey prongs, Category 1 compliance acknowledges and embraces securities classification:
Prong | Traditional Avoidance | Category 1 Approach |
|---|---|---|
1οΈβ£ Investment of Money | Claim "format change" not investment | β Acknowledge: Investors pay for equity |
2οΈβ£ Common Enterprise | Claim "separation" | β Acknowledge: Investors share in company |
3οΈβ£ Expectation of Profits | Claim "entertainment" | β Acknowledge: Equity investment implies profit expectation |
4οΈβ£ Efforts of Others | Claim "community driven" | β Acknowledge: Company management drives value |
Why This Is Better
Avoidance Risk | Compliance Benefit |
|---|---|
π¨ SEC enforcement action | β Operating within SEC framework |
π¨ Investor lawsuits for misrepresentation | β Clear securities disclosure |
π¨ Criminal fraud charges if theory fails | β Good faith compliance |
π¨ Market exclusion by institutions | β Institutional participation enabled |
π¨ Reputational damage | β Regulatory legitimacy |
B. Regulation D 506(c) Compliance
ST22 Tokenized Securities are offered under Regulation D Rule 506(c):
Requirement | Implementation | Status |
|---|---|---|
ποΈ Accredited Investors Only | All purchasers must verify accredited status | β |
β Verification Required | Third-party accreditation verification | β |
π’ General Solicitation Permitted | May publicly advertise offering | β |
π Form D Filing | Filed with SEC within 15 days | β |
π« Bad Actor Check | Disqualification verification | β |
Accredited Investor Qualification (SEC Rule 501)
Qualification | Criteria |
|---|---|
π° Individual Income | $200,000+ annually for past 2 years (or $300,000 joint) |
π¦ Net Worth | $1,000,000+ excluding primary residence |
π Professional License | Series 7, 65, or 82 holder |
π’ Entity | $5,000,000+ in assets |
ποΈ Institutional | Banks, broker-dealers, insurance companies, RIAs |
C. Additional Compliance Requirements
Requirement | Implementation |
|---|---|
π΅ Bank Secrecy Act | Full AML program, SAR/CTR filing |
π« OFAC Sanctions | Real-time screening via Transfer Hooks |
π Record Keeping | 7-year transaction record retention |
π¦ Transfer Agent | Empire Stock Transfer coordination |
π Form D Maintenance | Annual amendments as required |
ποΈ Implementation Framework
Phase 1: Issuer Onboarding
Step | Action | Compliance Function |
|---|---|---|
1 | Board Resolution | Direct issuer authorization (Pillar 1) |
2 | Certificate of Designation | Official shareholder register (Pillar 2) |
3 | Legal Review | Securities compliance verification |
4 | Due Diligence | Issuer background verification |
5 | Agreement Execution | Tripartite Agreement signing |
Phase 2: Share Custody
Step | Action | Compliance Function |
|---|---|---|
1 | CUSIP Assignment | Clear ownership chain (Pillar 5) |
2 | Share Deposit | Empire Stock Transfer custody (Pillar 3) |
3 | Golden Medallion | Authentication guarantee |
4 | Oracle Integration | Real-time custody verification |
5 | Verification Confirmation | 1:1 backing confirmed |
Phase 3: Token Minting
Step | Action | Compliance Function |
|---|---|---|
1 | Smart Contract Deployment | Transfer Hook controls active |
2 | Token Minting | 1:1 with custodied shares (Pillar 4) |
3 | Control Verification | All 42 controls tested |
4 | CEDEX Listing | Trading venue activation |
5 | Issuer Purchase | 40% liquidity pool funding |
Phase 4: Ongoing Compliance
Requirement | Frequency | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
π¦ Custody Verification | Continuous (~400ms) | Transfer Hook Oracle |
ποΈ Accreditation Check | Per transaction | KYC Provider |
π« OFAC Screening | Per transaction | Transfer Hook |
π Wallet Limits | Per transaction | Transfer Hook |
π΄ Circuit Breakers | As triggered | Transfer Hook |
π Record Keeping | Continuous | Compliance System |
π Form D Updates | As required | Legal Department |
π‘οΈ Investor Protection Architecture
Category 1 Protections vs. "Shield" Theories
Protection Type | "Shield" Theory (Rejected) | Category 1 Compliance (Adopted) |
|---|---|---|
βοΈ Legal Basis | Untested legal theories | Established securities law |
π‘οΈ Enforcement | Rely on court acceptance | Mathematical enforcement |
π° Investor Recourse | None (not securities) | Full securities law remedies |
ποΈ Regulatory Standing | Uncertain | Clear compliance framework |
π Documentation | Disclaimers | Securities disclosures |
What Category 1 Protects Against
Risk | Protection Mechanism |
|---|---|
π Fraud | Securities anti-fraud provisions (Rule 10b-5) |
π° Misappropriation | Regulated custody at Empire Stock Transfer |
π Market Manipulation | Circuit breakers + wallet limits |
π Rug Pulls | 1:1 backing + protective conversion |
π Whale Concentration | 4.99% wallet limits |
π« Sanctions Evasion | Real-time OFAC screening |
π Information Asymmetry | Securities disclosure requirements |
What Category 1 Does NOT Protect Against
Risk | Investor Responsibility |
|---|---|
π Market Losses | Investment can lose value |
π’ Issuer Failure | Underlying company may fail |
π§ Liquidity Risk | May not be able to sell at desired price |
π Volatility | Prices may fluctuate significantly |
π§ Technology Risk | Smart contracts may have vulnerabilities |
β οΈ Important: Category 1 compliance provides regulatory protections and compliance infrastructureβit does NOT guarantee investment returns or protect against market losses.
π OTCM Utility Token: Separate Classification
Distinct Regulatory Treatment
The OTCM Utility Token is a completely separate instrument from ST22 Tokenized Securities:
Factor | ST22 Tokenized Securities | OTCM Utility Token |
|---|---|---|
βοΈ Classification | SECURITIES | Utility Token |
π Framework | SEC Category 1 | Utility token analysis |
π Backing | 1:1 Preferred Series "M" | None |
π¦ Custody | Empire Stock Transfer | User wallets |
ποΈ Restrictions | Accredited investors only | None |
π§ Function | Equity ownership | Governance, fees, staking |
OTCM Utility Token Characteristics
Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
π³οΈ Governance | DAO voting rights |
πΈ Fee Discounts | 10-50% trading fee discounts |
π¦ Staking | 8-40% APY from protocol fees |
π Premium Features | Access to premium platform features |
π« No Backing | Explicitly has no asset backing |
β οΈ Critical Distinction: The OTCM Utility Token is NOT a security and is NOT covered by the Category 1 framework. It has no asset backing and should not be confused with ST22 Tokenized Securities.
π― Why Category 1 Compliance Is Superior
Strategic Advantages Over Avoidance Approaches
Advantage | Description |
|---|---|
βοΈ Regulatory Clarity | Operating within clear SEC framework, not testing untested theories |
π¦ Institutional Access | Institutions can participate in compliant securities infrastructure |
π‘οΈ Investor Protection | Full federal securities law protections apply |
π Market Credibility | Securities market legitimacy vs. "meme token" perception |
π― Target Market Fit | Serves serious investors seeking liquidity, not speculators |
πΌ Professional Standards | Institutional-grade compliance infrastructure |
π Sustainable Model | Long-term viability within regulatory framework |
Risk Comparison
Risk Category | Avoidance Approach | Category 1 Compliance |
|---|---|---|
π¨ Enforcement Risk | Highβtheories untested | Lowβoperating within framework |
βοΈ Legal Risk | Highβcould be deemed securities anyway | Lowβalready classified as securities |
ποΈ Regulatory Risk | Highβguidance could change | Lowerβestablished securities law |
π Market Risk | Highβinstitutional exclusion | Lowerβinstitutional participation enabled |
π Operational Risk | Highβconstant legal uncertainty | Lowerβclear compliance requirements |
π Regulatory References
Primary Authorities
Reference | Citation |
|---|---|
[1] | SEC Tokenized Securities Joint Statement (PRIMARY AUTHORITY). https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/corp-fin-statement-tokenized-securities-012826 β January 28, 2026 |
[2] | SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) β Investment contract test |
[3] | Regulation D, 17 CFR Β§ 230.501-506 β Private offering exemption |
[4] | SEC Rule 501 β Accredited investor definition |
[5] | SEC Rule 10b-5 β Anti-fraud provisions |
[6] | Bank Secrecy Act β AML requirements |
[7] | OFAC Sanctions Programs β Sanctions compliance |
β οΈ Important Disclaimers
Legal Notice
Disclaimer | Description |
|---|---|
π Not Legal Advice | This document does not constitute legal advice |
π¨ββοΈ Counsel Recommended | Consult qualified securities counsel |
π Subject to Change | Regulatory framework may evolve |
π No Guarantees | Compliance does not guarantee investment returns |
βοΈ Individualized Analysis | Securities law requires case-specific analysis |
Investment Risks
Risk | Description |
|---|---|
πΈ Total Loss | You may lose your entire investment |
π Market Risk | Values may decline significantly |
π’ Issuer Risk | Underlying companies may fail |
π§ Liquidity Risk | May not be able to sell when desired |
π§ Technology Risk | Smart contract vulnerabilities may exist |
β οΈ ST22 Tokenized Securities are securities under federal securities laws. Investing in securities involves substantial risk including possible loss of your entire investment. Category 1 compliance provides regulatory protections but does NOT guarantee against investment losses.
π Document Information
Field | Value |
|---|---|
π Document Version | 3.0 |
π Last Updated | January 2026 |
π Jurisdiction | Federal (United States) |
ποΈ Primary Authority | SEC Category 1 Joint Statement (January 28, 2026) |
π Supersedes | "Howey Shield" Framework (deprecated) |
π Conclusion
The Category 1 Advantage
The SEC Category 1 Compliance Framework represents a fundamental strategic shift from attempting to avoid securities classification to embracing securities compliance:
Old Approach (Deprecated) | New Approach (Adopted) |
|---|---|
β Engineer around Howey Test | β Satisfy Howey Test, embrace securities status |
β Untested legal theories | β Established SEC framework |
β "Meme token" positioning | β Tokenized securities infrastructure |
β Regulatory arbitrage | β Regulatory compliance |
β Institutional exclusion | β Institutional participation |
β Enforcement risk | β Compliance certainty |
Core Principle
π‘ OTCM Protocol operates SEC Category 1 compliant tokenized securities infrastructureβproviding regulatory clarity, institutional credibility, and investor protection through established securities law rather than untested legal theories.
Β© 2026 OTCM Protocol, Inc. | All Rights Reserved
ST22 Tokenized Securities are securities under federal securities laws pursuant to SEC Category 1 (Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities) framework. The "Howey Shield" framework is deprecated and has been replaced by SEC Category 1 compliance.